When I started my career in procurement, my colleagues would
often tell me, and in some ways inculcate fear in me, that I should get ready
because working in this area would turn me into a mix between a firefighter,
analyst, politician, and a consultor; what they never mentioned was that in
some occasions I would have to become a babysitter as well.
Many have probably lived through similar experiences as
mine, experiences involving internal clients (IC) that are reluctant to follow
company policy or procedures for the acquisition of goods and services; some
simply because they ignore the process and others because they deliberately
don’t like to go through the formal channels.
These situations are very stressful and require composure,
so in order to win some of these internal clients over, we have to hold
ourselves from saying some of those nice adjectives that we would love to vocalize,
and start showing them the light at the end of the procurement tunnel.
In my experience, and trying to avoid sounding like a
wildlife documentary narrator, this particular type of internal client is
usually found in highly technical areas; they are almost exclusively involved
in their specific science and don’t often interact with procurement. This
internal client is someone who works or has worked at a company that has a basic
procurement structure that is mostly transactional in nature; they have a habit
of working directly with vendors, negotiating for themselves, establishing
rules, and even signing agreements with no power of attorney and of course,
bypassing legal (it’s amazing and dangerous that some vendors even accept this).
Unfortunately, the most common approach to getting
introduced to this kind of internal clients is from above, their direct
superior, who will just command the IC to work with procurement from now on,
resulting in some rejection from the beginning. Definitely not a good way to start
a work relationship.
As you can see I am generalizing a bit, every person and
situation is different and your approach for connecting with them might vary,
but in general it is important for the internal client to see you as someone who
adds value, that your role will simplify theirs and bring in substantial know
how into the relationship; as soon as you are able to demonstrate that your
presence will help them save time, things should improve considerably.
To start implementing this change, we don’t want to come off
as an aggressive invader, so we can discard the idea of going to his superior
for a “do what you are told” speech. An alternative plan might be to have a
pre-planned meeting (with the IC’s superior’s blessing and alignment) that involves
“selling” procurement to the internal client and his superior at the same time.
If the IC sees that he is being involved from the beginning in this change
process and also witnesses his superior starting to get on board with the idea,
then you would have successfully reduced the friction of transitioning things
to procurement. The work from here forward should be somewhat less tragic.
Since nothing is this simple or effective, in
some situations it will require that you help this transition go even smoother,
meaning you have to get him involved in some sourcing instances that you
normally wouldn’t. This sense of involvement will definitely help generate
trust between you and the internal client by opening the opportunity to share a
couple of good sourcing tips such as how to approach specific vendors or
situations, benchmark insights etc.
I would also recommend you accept some tips from the IC as
well, as these gestures will definitely show that you are not here to show off
or preach; you might even get surprised and learn something new.
Finally, talk to the vendors about the new rules of
engagement with the IC’s, find time to periodically align with these internal
clients, work on the strategy and approach you want to take as a team prior to meeting
and negotiating with suppliers, something as portraying a variation of good
cop, bad cop with a supplier might help strengthen the relationship and trust.
Post A Comment:
0 comments so far,add yours