We are playing off the commonly used idiom “to draw a line
in the sand” which implies a both a boundary and a set of consequences for
crossing it. All organizations have limits on their procurement resources. As a
consequence, some portion of their spend will go unmanaged or fall under
ineffective management. The “line in the spend” represents the point at which
this happens. The consequences for crossing this line include an inability to aggregate
volume for better pricing or even situations where aggregation isn’t possible to
bid these items and services more competitively.
The placement of this line is going to be different for each
organization and each individual set of circumstances. Many large companies
have robust processes, teams, and solutions to manage their direct materials
and large indirect categories. For them, the line typically identifies what is
called tail spend. This “tail” is typically comprised of small purchases (think
10s of thousands of POs) with close to as many one-time suppliers. It can make
up 60-80% of their suppliers and represent 15-20% of their total spend. After
all, a large multinational organization may have millions of purchase orders
and invoices a month.
For mid-sized companies the line may shift to the left in the
spend to supplier count graph. There may be categories that they consider tail
spend that actually have enough volume to aggregate for discounts. However, they
may lack the resources to even comb through the spend data and identify consolidation
opportunities let alone the resources and expertise to source complex or
heavily vested stakeholder categories like Telecom or Marketing.
A small company or start-up may lack a formalized procurement
organization entirely. Their line designating unmanaged spend is all the way to
the left in the graph. The dollar value of that spend may only be $10’s or
$100’s of millions of dollars, if not lower. They would benefit from the
efficiencies and automation of technology as well, but would fail trying to
implement them on their own.
Regardless of where that line is for your organization, one
option for managing that portion of your spend is to simply outsource it. There are a variety of offerings from leveragingGPO contacts, a managed P2P provider or a buying desk. Holistic managed service
providers can offer an end to end process from strategic sourcing, PO and
invoice processing and payment aggregation enabled by technology to provide
automation and visibility.
It may makes sense to get some guidance on where that line
is for your organization and which of these options make sense for you. The
right Service provider can bring you the technology, the process, and the expertise
to cross the line in the sand safely and get all of your spend under
management.
Post A Comment:
0 comments so far,add yours