Logistics is a highly complex category that is oftentimes
mismanaged from a sourcing prospective. There are many moving pieces and
different factors that need to be taken into consideration when evaluating the total
cost of a specific transit lane, whether it be with an Airline such as United,
or a Domestic Freight Provider such as YRC. Over the years, Carriers have
developed proprietary pricing systems referred to as “Base Rates” or “Tariffs” --
and oftentimes the majority of the total cost of shipping goods can be
attributed to these different fees. The biggest challenge with evaluating this
spend category is the proprietary nature of the pricing schema that Carriers
use to come up with a tariff or Base rate structure that is applied to
different transit lanes.
In the LTL
(less than truck load) space, Carriers will offer a discount off of their base/tariff
Rate. The Tariff with LTL carriers is simply a formula which takes into
consideration factors like weight (in kgs, lbs, etc.), volumetric size, total mileage
of a route, origin, destination, etc. Once all inputs are entered into the
Tariff calculator the customer would receive a base price to transport products
based on all these factors. Each Carrier’s tariff assigns slightly different
weights to each factor of cost which results in the disparity from Tariff to Tariff
(Carrier to Carrier). For example, YRC may have hundreds of dispatch and
trucking depots in Montana, whereas UPS has a limited presence in that area. Therefore,
YRC would assign less of a cost based on the originating Montana Zip code and
UPS’ Tariff structure would assign a higher cost based on the input of the Zip
code since it costs UPS more to operate in that region. Think of it as a
regression formula used to estimate the cost of shipments by the Carriers.
Since each Carrier uses a different “regression formula”, their costs, after
running through their Tariff programs, will always be slightly different based
on their operating model and overall infrastructure. And as mentioned before,
since each Carrier assigns a discount to their own Tariff structure during negotiations
and contracting, it is virtually impossible to compare apples to apples
amongst different suppliers. Each discount is discounting from a different base
rate, and each base rate is calculated differently based on the inputs, so
therefore a 50% discount from YRC’s proprietary tariff can be more competitive
than UPS’ 75% discount from their proprietary tariff or vise-versa.
There is good news though. Carriers are willing to use
alternative Tariff structures – usually by request only – to price out your
lanes. When all Carriers use the same Tariff during a bidding
process, you can then effectively evaluate Tariff discounts on an apples to
apples basis across all lanes since discounts are being provided, per each
region, from the same Base Rate/Tariff calculator. Universally available Tariff
subscriptions are commonly held by most major Carriers. Czarlite is a very
popular benchmark
base rate that is used in North America.
When running
a sourcing event for multiple lanes, with multiple carriers, it is
paramount to utilize a universal Tariff structure to enable an apples to apples
pricing comparison. By utilizing a standardized bidding and contracting
structure it is much easier to evaluate lane optimization scenarios with
multiple suppliers. For example, it is much easier to identify and compare
where certain Carriers may be more competitive than others, region by region
(per the Montana Zip code example), or by shipment type.
Post A Comment:
0 comments so far,add yours