As the use of credit cards, debit cards, and alternate
electronic payment methods continues to grow, small and large businesses alike
will find the utilization of credit card processing services a necessity to
remain competitive. The fees associated
with credit card processing are often accepted as a necessary evil, and are
overlooked as a place for negotiation and cost savings. With the right provider,
knowledge, and enough leverage, even a small business can minimize their merchant
account costs. Learning to navigate the cost structures present in the market
can reduce the burden on the merchant and lead to more transparency between the
merchant and service provider.
Before diving into the payment structures, the transactions fees
must be understood. Each time a payment
is processed, the transaction will be charged an interchange fee. This charge is non-negotiable as it is set by
the payment networks and will be passed through to the merchant by the merchant
account provider. Interchange fees vary
depending on the type of transaction. This
fee varies depending on if a physical card was present, if a signature or PIN
number was captured, and which card network is being used (VISA, MC, etc.).
On top of the interchange fee, each merchant account
provider will charge a markup. This
markup is the provider’s direct fee for processing and settling each
transaction. This fee is set by the
merchant account provider and is one area for negotiation when choosing a supplier. Additional ad-hoc fees exist as well such as
chargeback fees, tokenization and encryption fees, and batch fees. However, the
interchange fees and their markup comprise the majority of the cost, which is
why choosing the cost structure that offers the best value for your business is
important when negotiating a merchant account agreement.
Cost Structures
The first type is a blended
cost structure. With this, all
transactions are charged the same fee regardless of the cost of the sale or
type of transaction. This fee structure
offers very little transparency into which level of clearance (interchange
rate) each transaction receives and the associated cost. As a result, the blended rates run the risk
of being higher than other payment structures, especially for businesses that
primarily processes card present debit transactions. One upside to this fee, however, is that
there is typically not a monthly charge associated which makes it a reasonable
choice for a business that processes a low volume of credit card transactions.
Another type is a tiered
or “bundled” fee structure. Tiered
pricing operates similarly to the blended structure, however it breaks the
transactions into three categories rather than treating them all as equal. Each transaction is either marked qualified,
mid-qualified, or non-qualified.
Qualified transactions are awarded the cheapest rate and must meet a
list of criteria such as the card being present in the transaction and the
customer’s signature being collected. If
one item from the criteria list is not met, the transaction may be downgraded
to mid-qualified or non-qualified rates.
While this structure offers better pricing than the blended structure
for a business with high volume card present transactions, it still lacks
transparency into what the actual interchange cost is versus what the merchant
is paying. Additionally, qualification
criteria can be increasingly complicated, leading to more transactions not
clearing at the preferred rate.
The final structure type is what is known as interchange plus. With this model, the credit network fee is
clearly listed per transaction, and the markup is fixed and listed separately. This structure allows for the most
transparency into the true cost of each transaction, and offers room for
negotiation of the markup fee charged by the merchant service provider,
especially for large volume merchants.
While the visibility presents the opportunity to receive lower pricing,
it is not a guarantee. It is critical to
audit the interchange costs to ensure that the amount being passed through
matches the published rates from the card networks. Additionally it is important to negotiate a
markup that is competitive within the market. While the rate must be shown
separately, it is not required to be a reasonable rate. With the right expertise, this desirable
structure can greatly reduce the overall cost of your payment processing
services.
Regardless of which fee structure best fits your business model, Source One Management Services has the knowledge and expertise to pinpoint opportunities for cost savings and process improvement in the merchant accounts category. For more information on our full suite of services please visit our webpage.
Post A Comment:
0 comments so far,add yours