
Being cognizant of budgeting has always allowed for strong
bottom line figures, and it seems fairly wasteful to institute a supplier
relationship management program when contracts serve to prevent discrepancy. The
preceding thought process is not rare. Many banks believed their existing
programs to be fail proof, and although this may prove true internally, it is
increasingly difficult to effectively manage third party vendor relationships
without a management system. In the case of the hypothetical bank, deviation
from these guidelines could lead to financial penalties, legal battles and a
tarnished reputation. In other words, the benefits perceived from not having a
program in place would quickly be reversed by the consequences of violation.
Although an organization’s internal compliance may be
immaculate, according to the OCC Bulletin 2013-29 and CFPB Bulletin 2012-3,
that does not extend to independently operated third party associations. With
an industry as tied to the public welfare as banking, these bulletins serve to
protect consumers from an economically damaging occurrence by a third party
vendor. Since these parties are clearly their own entity, supplier relationship
management programs reduce supplier risk through an in-depth awareness of
supplier operations pertaining to the core business. Adequate supplier risk
management practices can prevent consequences for violation of any
compliance-related responsibilities.
With the SRM benefit potential in mind, Source One has
released two webpages further discussing the bulletins, their implications for
banks, and the solutions we provide to tackle third-party risk. The CFPB Bulletin 2012-3 and
OCC Bulletin 2013-29
guidelines can significantly impact banks, and attention to their terms and
instruction can allow a bank to lead the market.
Photo courtesy of: insidecounsel.com
Post A Comment:
0 comments so far,add yours