Recently, I have been involved in a few projects with my clients where the stakeholder teams wanted to perform “pilot programs” as part of the vendor evaluation process.
It goes
without saying that a strategy of “try before you buy” as a form of assessing an IT solution can be advantageous to a company before signing up for a long term partnership.
That said, what I have seen is that even a short term, three to five month, pilot
can cost over $100,000 to execute successfully and that’s not including the
soft costs involved like the resources needed to run the program (especially if a side-by
side comparison of two or more systems are being evaluated), the data security
and IT life cycle assessments, testing and validation requirements, the strategic sourcing and contracting activities, and so
forth.

A mistake that I have seen my clients make is that they are introducing the idea of a pilot program too late into the process of
evaluating the suppliers. They may have issued a RFP/RFI, gone through series of demos,
and perhaps even asked for an initial quote before bringing to a vendor the
request to run a pilot program.
From a negotiation standpoint, bringing the pilot up at the
later stages of a vendor evaluation puts you at a disadvantage. A considerable amount of time has been invested in creating, distributing, and analyzing the RFP. Project team members have sat through vendor demos and everyone is anxious to move the
project forward.
Project team leads and their sourcing partners will review the Pilot Program proposals and typically will go through
several rounds of discussions and negotiations. While you can leverage the idea
the “if the pilot goes well, we’ll move towards a longer term engagement”, and
try to keep your requirements as "Out of the Box" as possible, it’s difficult to
force the account reps hand on reducing costs when they know they have gotten very close
to a sale.
So what are some solutions? Below are a couple of ideas that
we should use going forward on these types of engagements:
- If issuing a RFP/RFI, the question should be asked if
the vendor is able to provide a Pilot evaluation of their solution at no
cost to your organization.
- I recommend having this question in the RFP even if
you don’t think you would run a pilot program. It’s just another
evaluation point for your team to consider.
- You should ask what the vendor would provide in a pilot
program (length of program, amount of custom configurations they will provide, training,
support, etc.)
- If a vendor cannot run a pilot at no cost, you should know up front what they would charge for the short-term engagement. This will help with
budgeting, and may influence the decision to even pursue a pilot program with
a particular vendor.
- It goes without saying that having a very strong set
of requirements and desired outcomes will go a long way in working
through the needs for a pilot, as well as how the team would design the pilot in conjunction with the vendor.
- If not issuing a RFP, and going straight to demos or
direct discussions with vendors, the same set of questions should be
asked.
Pilot programs can be a part of a smart and effective strategy for assessing information technology partners. But they can be budget busters also. As with all strategic sourcing initiatives, you want to gain as much insight as early in the process to gain the knowledge needed to make well-informed decisions.
Source One has been providing Strategic Sourcing consulting services for 25 years. We have subject matter experts in all areas of information technology and are ready to help with all of your IT sourcing and procurement challenges.
Post A Comment:
0 comments so far,add yours